Limit Feeding with a Bale Feeder, Bunk and a Bucket
By: Aaron Berger, Nebraska Extension Educator
When the availability of hay is limited by both quantity and quality, the feeding of grain and co-products in a bunk can be utilized to provide the additional protein and energy needed to meet cow nutrient needs. Photo credit- Karla Wilke.
Drought conditions are challenging producers to be creative as they think about options for maintaining the cowherd through the summer with limited pasture available. Several research studies conducted at the University of Nebraska have shown that cows can be managed effectively utilizing a limit fed ration.
In a limit fed ration, the nutrient requirements of cattle are met with a diet that is less than the actual total amount that the cattle would eat if they had full access to all they could. Typically, these are total mixed rations, fed with a feed truck or wagon, consisting of limited amounts of forage and combined with protein and energy dense feed resources such as distillers grains, corn, corn silage, beet pulp, soy hull pellets, etc.
For producers without access to a feed wagon, limit feeding can still be an option. Research at the University of Illinois1 and the University of Minnesota2 has shown that cows can be given timed access to hay bales in feeders and limit intake as well as waste. In the University of Illinois study, cows were restricted to as little as 3 hours of access to a bale feeder consisting of a high-quality hay. Cows restricted to 3 hours of access consumed 17 lbs. of dry matter of hay per day while cows with 24-hour access consumed 34 lbs. of hay per day on a dry matter basis. Total hay waste was reduced significantly in both research studies when cows were limited to 14 hours or less to the bale feeders. In these studies, hay quality was more than adequate to meet cow nutrition requirements. Testing hay quality and knowing cattle nutrient requirements is important when utilizing this method of limited hay feeding.
The type of bale feeder used can also significantly impact the amount of hay waste. Research conducted by Oklahoma State University3 showed that bale ring feeder types can significantly impact the amount of hay lost to trampling and fouling. Researchers examined four bale feeder designs: a conventional open-bottom steel ring, a sheeted-bottom steel ring, a polyethylene pipe ring, and a modified cone feeder with a sheeted bottom. Hay waste was the lowest for the cone feeder at 5.3%. The polyethylene feeder and the open-bottom steel ring feeder had the highest percentage of waste at 21% and 20.5% respectively. The sheeted-bottom feeder was intermediate, with a waste level of 13%. The combination of timed access to hay and use of bale ring feeders that reduce hay waste can stretch limited hay supplies.
When the availability of hay is limited by both quantity and quality, the feeding of grain and co-products in a bunk can be utilized to provide the additional protein and energy needed to meet a cow’s nutrient needs.
A research study conducted by Ohio State University4 showed mature cows could be fed a diet consisting of limit-fed corn as an alternative to hay when cows were in late gestation and early lactation. Cows were either fed around 11 pounds of whole shelled corn, 2.5 pounds of a pelleted supplement, and 2 pounds of hay (dry matter basis) or offered hay and a free choice salt and mineral from November to April. Hay offered free choice was predominantly first cutting orchardgrass testing around 72% neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and 9.5% crude protein (CP). Cows in this study fed free choice hay ate twice as much feed as the limit fed diet. Cows on the limit-fed corn-based diet experienced no detrimental effects on subsequent performance, conception rates or on calf weaning weight when the limit-fed period was followed by summer grazing on pasture.
For producers without a feed truck or wagon, consider the following management practices when utilizing limit feeding.
Limit feeding of cows in a dry lot can be accomplished without needing to feed a total mixed ration. With some creativity and planning, producers can often use existing equipment and resources in a way to limit feed and meet cow nutrition needs without the use of a feed truck or wagon.
For more information on managing cow-calf pairs in a dry lot, see Drylotting Beef Cows - A Drought Management Strategy.
1Miller, A. J., D. B. Faulkner, T. C. Cunningham, and J. M. Dahlquist. 2007. Restricting time of access to large round bales of hay affects hay waste and cow performance. Prof. Anim. Sci. 23:366-372. https://www.appliedanimalscience.org/article/S1080-7446(15)30990-6/pdf
2Jaderborg, J.P., S.L. Bird, G.I. Crawford, R.S. Walker, A. DiCostanzo. 2021 Influence of hay feeding method, supplement moisture, or access time on intake and waste by beef cows, Transl. Anim. Sci. Volume 5, Issue 2, txab069, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab069
3Austin J. S., M.F. Moore, C.P. McMurphy, G.L. Mourer, S.K. Linneen, M.A. Brown, C.J. Richards, D.L. Lalman. 2021. Effects of bale feeder design on hay waste, intake, and apparent diet digestibility in gestating beef cows, Transl. Anim. Sci. Volume 5, Issue 3, txab104, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab104
4Loerch, Steven. 1996. Limit-feeding corn as an alternative to hay for gestating beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 74: 1211-1216.
Interviews with the authors of BeefWatch newsletter articles become available throughout the month of publication and are accessible at https://go.unl.edu/podcast.
Authored by Aaron Berger, Nebraska Extension Educator.
Source: University of Nebraska-Lincoln